Legal Opinion
Newman v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 2002No. 98-CO-1348, 98-CO-1456PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUIZ, Associate Judge:
This is the second appeal by Michael Newman and Delonte Samuels involving their conviction for the death of Rudy Williams.1 In their first appeal, we held *920that the trial court erred when it applied the wrong standard in excluding Samuels’ proffered evidence of other, similar crimes by a third party (“Winfield ”2 evidence), and denied Newman’s motion for a new trial pursuant to D.C.Code § 23-110 without a hearing. See Newman v. United States, 705 A.2d 246, 265 (D.C.1997). The case was remanded to determine whether Samuels’ testimony should have been admitted under the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Punch v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
- Winfield v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- Newman v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gethers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Riddick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Bruce v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- United States v. MortonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2012
- Hunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hunter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.