Hunter v. United States

I concur with the majority’s decision to affirm the appellant’s convictions for felony threats arising out of the events on October 13, 2004. However, I write separately to note my view that the trial court improperly excluded the evidence appellant sought to introduce regarding Mr. Moul-ing’s conviction for armed drug trafficking with a Ruger P90 semi-automatic pistol.1 *1166Instead, I conclude that the evidence should have been admitted as relevant and probative because the evidence created doubt that Mr. Hunter could have possessed the gun, which was found hidden inside a makeup case, inside a…