Legal Opinion
State v. HESS CORP.
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 21, 2009No. 2008-899PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, C.J.
This is an interlocutory appeal from an order of the Superior Court (Mangones, J.) granting the motion to dismiss filed by the defendants, Flint Hills Resources LP (Flint Hills) and Western Refining Yorktown, Inc. (Yorktown). See Sup. Ct. R. 8. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.
We accept the statement of the case and facts as presented in the interlocutory appeal statement and rely upon the record for additional facts as necessary. See In the Matter of Berg & Berg, 152 N.H. 658, 659 (2005). The State brought this action against refiners and manufacturers that allegedly supplied…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- California v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether ("MTBE") Products Liability Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Ayres v. WiswallSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jontra Holdings Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company Brisbane Angels Nominees Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company and Associated Construction Equipment Pty Ltd, an Australian Registered Company v. Gas Sensing Technology Corporation, a Wyoming Corporation D/B/A WelldogWyoming Supreme Court · 2021
- Swarey v. StephensonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- State v. North Atlantic Refining LimitedSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Christopher MacMahon v. Elizabeth TinkhamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015
- Rainville v. Lakes Region Water Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.