Legal Opinion
John Farrelly v. City of Concord & A
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 23, 2015No. 2014-0480PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynn, J.
The plaintiff, John Farrelly, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Smukler, J.) granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Concord police officers Walter Carroll and Eric Pichler and the City of Concord (city), on the basis that the defendants are entitled to official and vicarious immunity. This case presents the question of whether our decision in Everitt v. Gen. Elec. Co., 156 N.H. 202 (2007) applies to intentional torts. We conclude that it does and that the language set forth in Huckins v. McSweeney, 166 N.H. 176 (2014) must be interpreted consistently with the standard…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Cox v. Maine State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Frese v. FormellaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2022
- Scott L. Bach & a. v. New Hampshire Department of SafetySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Lynette Maryea v. Thomas Velardi & ASupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2016
- Kari Smart, et al. v. Strafford County, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2024
- Shawn Murphy v. Strafford County et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2022
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.