Maltz v. Fletcher
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. (Emerick, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.
The facts out of which this litigation arises appear in the opinion of the Court in Beekman v. Fletcher 48 Mich. 156. In the year 1881 John G-. Beekman, assignee of the Alpena Lumber Company, filed his bill in the circuit court for the county of Alpena in chancery to restrain Fletcher from interfering with or taking legal or other measures to get possession of certain logs, the ownership of which was in dispute between them. The bill showed that the controversy respecting the logs was involved in another suit in equity to which Beekman and Fletcher were parties, and it prayed no other relief…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bowker v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
- Catlin v. BirchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
- Colman v. PostMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Beekman v. FletcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
3Cited by10 opinions
- First National Bank v. BurneyNebraska Supreme Court · 1912
- La Grande National Bank v. BlumOregon Supreme Court · 1894
- Mehlin v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'nCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. BakaianMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Gottesman v. RheinfrankMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.