Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Burney

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 20, 1912No. 16,569PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Opinion on motion for rehearing of case reported in 90 Neb. 432.

1Opinion of the CourtFawcett, J.

This case was argued and submitted upon a motion for rehearing, our former opinion being reported in 90 Neb. 432. The issues will be found clearly stated in the opinion there reported. It will be observed that the controversy here is.between the plaintiff bank and defendant Britton, who was surety upon the note in suit.

The case turns upon the proposition as to whether or not defendant Britton could rely upon the contemporaneous oral agreement set up in his answer, and the performance of the terms and conditions of that agreement, as a defense to the note. The evidence offered by defendants…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Oakland Cemetery Ass'n of Lyons v. LakinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  3. Barnett v. PrattNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Norman v. WaiteNebraska Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Davis v. SternsNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ford v. Luria Steel & Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  2. Security Savings Bank v. RhodesNebraska Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Coffman v. MaloneNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Elmcreek Ditch Co. v. St. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Spangenberg v. LoseyNebraska Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API