Legal Opinion

Mehlin v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n

Court Of Appeals Of Indian Territory

Decided June 6, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern Dirtsict. ¥m. M. Springer, Judge. Action by the Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association against James G. Mehlin. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant-appeals. The questions at issue in this case arise on the pleadings, and judgment of the lower court thereon.

Read the full summary

Appeal from the United States Court for the Northern Dirtsict. ¥m. M. Springer, Judge. Action by the Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association against James G. Mehlin. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant-appeals. The questions at issue in this case arise on the pleadings, and judgment of the lower court thereon. On the 15th day of November, A. D. 1894, the Mutual Reserve Fund Life Association, plaintiff (hereinafter called “appellee”) instituted suit in the United States court for the Northern district of the Indian Territory, at Muskogee, against James G. Mehlin, defendant (hereinafter called…

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The only question of importance raised by the-record in this case necessary to be passed upon by this court is, was the note set forth in the complaint legally delivered by appellant to appellee, so as to form a complete legal contract, binding upon appellant, and enforceable at law? While it is a well settled rule of law that parol evidence is not admissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written instrument, “the rule would become the instrument it was intended to prevent, if there were no exceptions to the universality of its application.” Insurance Co. vs Wilkinson, 13 Wall. 231. In…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Burke v. DulaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Ware v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Benton v. . MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Farmers' Bank of Roff v. NicholsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Tovera v. ParkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Larson v. SeguinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API