Legal Opinion
United States v. Cesareo-Ayala
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 12, 2009No. 08-3201PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTZ, Circuit Judge.
Alejo Cesareo-Ayala appeals from jury convictions of three drug offenses. He challenges his conviction of possession of cocaine on the ground that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the verdict. Alternatively, he argues that the district court erred in denying him a new trial on the charge because “the evidence preponderate^] heavily against the verdict.” United States v. Evans, 42 F.3d 586, 593 (10th Cir.1994) (internal quotation marks omitted). Although not challenging the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions on the two other charges—…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. HuntCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. SummersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HanzlicekCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Iris Collette Jackson Dwight Dean JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.Com, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Ibarra-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Hillard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- United States v. AlcortaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.