Legal Opinion

Stuart v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 1, 1994No. 93-55229PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge GOODWIN.

GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:

Paul Stuart appeals from a judgment for the United States in his action for damages under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b) and 2671 et seq.

Plaintiff and his minor son, Nicholas Stuart, were injured, and his wife died, in an automobile colHsion in Temecula, California, when a Hyundai fleeing from U.S. Border Patrol agents crashed into the Stuart’s auto*1485mobile. After a bench trial, the court applied California Vehicle Code § 17004.7(b), which immunizes municipal governments from liability in police chase cases. The court…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. United States v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. S.O.S., Inc. v. Payday, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Sealy, Incorporated, a Corporation v. Easy Living, Inc., a Corporation, and Danco, Inc., and Jack Ward Mattress, Inc., D/B/A Pacifica Mattress CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Cigna Property and Casualty Insurance Company Cigna Group of Companies David F. Allen Alliance Marine Risk Managers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Counter v. Polaris Pictures Corporation U.S. Inbanco, Ltd., Defendants-Counter- Claimants-Appellants. Cigna Property and Casualty Insurance Company Cigna Group of Companies David F. Allen Alliance Marine Risk Managers, Inc. v. Polaris Pictures Corporation U.S. Inbanco, Ltd. Rex K. De GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  3. Albert Montes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. Kevin HINES; Cathy Zampa, as Guardian Ad Litem for Stephanie Hines, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  5. Alvarez-Machain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API