Legal Opinion
Albert Montes v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1994No. 92-55657PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The Memorandum decision filed August 31,1994 is redesignated an authored opinion.
OPINION
WILL, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff Albert Montes appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his action brought under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.C.C. § 1346, in which he sought damages for injuries he received when a vehicle being pursued by the United States Border Patrol struck his vehicle, 778 F.Supp. 19. At issue in this appeal is whether the plaintiffs notice of appeal was timely filed, thus giving this Court jurisdiction over the appeal, and, if so, whether the district court erred…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Indian Towing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- O'NEAL v. PriceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Sonoma County Ass'n of Retired Employees v. Sonoma CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Daniel Campbell v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Lolli v. County of OrangeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Marguerite Hiken v. Department of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.