Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge:
¶ 1 Timothy Lee suffered serious injuries while performing cleanup duties during the final stages of construction at a Sam’s Club store located on property owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”). Lee was employed at the time by Able Body Labor (“Able Body”) 1 , which supplied workers for M & H Enterprises, Inc. (“M & H”), the general contractor on the project. After Lee successfully pursued a workers’ compensation claim against Able Body, he sued Wal-Mart and M & H for negligence.
¶2 On appeal, Lee challenges the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
- Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lee v. City of KingmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
- Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
- Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
- Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Lynaugh v. 12th St.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.