Legal Opinion

Lee v. M & H Enterprises, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 21, 2015No. 1 CA-CV 13-0257PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROWN, Judge:

¶ 1 Timothy Lee suffered serious injuries while performing cleanup duties during the final stages of construction at a Sam’s Club store located on property owned by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (“Wal-Mart”). Lee was employed at the time by Able Body Labor (“Able Body”) 1 , which supplied workers for M & H Enterprises, Inc. (“M & H”), the general contractor on the project. After Lee successfully pursued a workers’ compensation claim against Able Body, he sued Wal-Mart and M & H for negligence.

¶2 On appeal, Lee challenges the trial court’s orders granting summary judgment in favor…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Welker v. Kennecott Copper CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  4. Ft. Lowell-NSS Ltd. Partnership v. KellyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lee v. City of KingmanDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
  2. Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  3. Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2019
  4. Alsadi v. Intel CorporationDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  5. Lynaugh v. 12th St.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API