Legal Opinion
Lee v. City of Kingman
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided August 25, 2015No. 3:14-cv-08218 JWSPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
JOHN W. SEDWICK, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. MOTION PRESENTED
At docket 34 defendant City of hangman (“Kingman”) moves to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) of plaintiffs Ronald Lee and Raola Lee (“the Lees”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). The Lees oppose at docket 37. Kingman replies at docket 41. Kingman filed a notice of supplemental'authority at docket 42, to which the Lees respond at docket 43.1 Oral argument was not requested and would not assist the court.
*987II. BACKGROUND
This case arises out of a tragic accident at a Fourth of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Moss v. U.S. Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dodev v. Citibank N.A.District Court, D. Arizona · 2025
- Johnson v. Chandler Unified School DistrictDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024