Legal Opinion

Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 5, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

The defendant’s motions for nonsuit and directed verdict were based upon the theory that it conclusively appeared both that the policies were obtained by fraud and that the insured committed suicide. The ground of suicide having been waived with respect to the exceptions to the denial of the motions, the only question raised by those motions is whether fraud conclusively appears. That leaves no question of law regarding suicide except one respecting instructions.

The discussion may center upon the denial of the motion for non-suit. But before that is considered, it will be convenient to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Penn Mut. Life Ins. v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  3. American Trust Co. v. Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Eastern District Piece Dye Works, Inc. v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Minsker v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ekalo v. Constructive Serv. Corp. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Hebert v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  3. State v. KaiserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
  4. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. ShannonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
  5. Manelas v. National Accident & Health InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API