Legal Opinion

Manelas v. National Accident & Health Insurance

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 1, 1938PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff cannot recover if the falsity of his statement “affected either the acceptance of the risk or the hazard assumed by the insurer.” P. L., c. 281, s. 15. In this jurisdiction a false statement as to medical history is held to affect the acceptance of the risk as a matter of law. Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Insurance Co., 88 N. H. 154, 163.

Judgment for the defendant.

Branch, J., did not sit.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Amoskeag Trust Co. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
  3. Warren Wallis v. HCC Life Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017