Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Primus

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 4, 2014No. AC35985PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The plaintiffs, William Thomas, Craig B. Thomas and Andrea Thomas Jabs, appeal from the trial court’s declaratory judgment granting an easement by necessity and implication in favor of the defendant, Bruno Primus. On appeal, the plaintiffs claim that the court erred in finding an easement by necessity. The plaintiffs also claim that the defendant’s claim for an easement should have been barred by the defense of laches. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts, as found by the court, are relevant to this appeal. The plaintiffs own property located at…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Collins v. PrenticeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1842
  2. Hollywyle Assn., Inc. v. HollisterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  3. Marshall v. MartinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  4. Griffeth v. EidNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Caminis v. TroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Francini v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API