Legal Opinion

Ranch House, Inc. v. City of Anniston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1996No. 1941524PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Ranch House, Inc., and its president sued for a judgment declaring Ordinance No. 94-0-03 of the City of Anniston unconstitutional. That ordinance prohibits nudity or partial nudity in establishments in which alcoholic beverages are dispensed, sold, or consumed. The trial court entered a summary judgment for the City. The plaintiffs appealed.

In the mid-1980s, Anniston experienced new crime problems after two topless bars opened in the City. The police chief determined these new problems were related to the topless bars and that they occurred because topless dancing was being performed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barton v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. State v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Lanier v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. T Backs Club, Inc. v. SeatonDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2000
  3. Chicago v. Pooh BahIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  4. City of Chicago v. Pooh Bah Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Ranch House, Inc. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API