Legal Opinion

Ranch House, Inc. v. City of Anniston

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 5, 1996No. 1941524Published

1Opinion of the Court

678 So.2d 745 (1996)

The RANCH HOUSE, INC., etc., et al.

v.

The CITY OF ANNISTON.

1941524.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

April 5, 1996.

Rehearing Denied June 14, 1996.

Steven H. Swander, Fort Worth, Texas, Cliff Callis, Gadsden, for Appellants.

George A. Monk of Merrill, Porch, Dillon & Fite, Anniston, for Appellee.

HOOPER, Chief Justice.

The Ranch House, Inc., and its president sued for a judgment declaring Ordinance No. 94-0-03 of the City of Anniston unconstitutional. That ordinance prohibits nudity or partial nudity in establishments in which alcoholic beverages are dispensed, sold, or consumed. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Barton v. City of BessemerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. State v. MillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  4. Lanier v. City of NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  5. Ranch House, Inc. v. City of AnnistonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API