Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1ConcurrenceBiggs, Circuit Judge
I think that I should make plain in what respects my opinion is in accord with or differs from that of the majority in the case at bar.
In August, 1935, the Pennsylvania Public Service Commission commenced investigations of the petitioners and certain other Pennsylvania corporations to ascertain facts in respect to their operating expense accounts and whether or not penalties should be imposed for certain alleged infractions of the Pennsylvania Utility Law. Certain phases of the investigation apparently could not be conducted’ adequately under the law of Pennsylvania and, at the request of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Procter & Gamble Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- American Construction Co. v. Jacksonville, Tampa & Key West Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Whitney v. DickSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.