Knapp v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the ease.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
The charging part of the indictment is as follows: “Henry R. Knapp, on the 21st day of December, in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and ninety-seven (1897), did lawfully marry in the State of New Jersey, and have for his wife one Margret D. Cooney, and while the said Margret D. Cooney was living, did in the County of Dallas and State of Texas, on the 26th day of March, A. D. 1906, marry and have for his wife one Charlie D. Clair, and afterwards on the 26th day of March, A. D. 1906, did unlawfully and feloniously have both the said Margret D. Cooney and the said…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stein v. BowmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
- State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- People v. QuanstromMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Boyd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Yeiral v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Stribling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Stribling v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Sargent v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910