Legal Opinion

Lynch v. Pee Dee Express, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 2, 1944No. 15653PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Associate Justice OxnEr

delivered the unanimous Opinion of the Court:

The question is whether the Court properly directed a verdict for defendant, on,the ground of contributory negligence and recklessness of the driver of plaintiff’s car, in an action arising out of a collision of an automobile and truck, on October 29, 1942, at the intersection of Purdy and Haynes-worth Streets in the City of Sumter, South Carolina.

Purdy Street runs north and south, and at the time of the collision, owing to some highway repairs being made in Sumter, was being used as a detour on State Highway No. 76. It…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hefner v. PatteeWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Adams v. CanfieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lineberger v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Stryker v. HastieOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Bedford v. Armory Wholesale Grocery Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1940

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. American Casualty Co. Of Reading, Pa. v. HowardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  2. Green v. SparksSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  3. Spencer v. KirbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959
  4. Lawter v. War Emergency Co-Operative Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Olin Mathieson Chemical Corp. v. Planters Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API