Legal Opinion

Mendoza v. J.M. Smucker Company

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided May 23, 2023No. 5:22-cv-02281Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION SHERRY L. MENDOZA, ) Case No. 5:22-cv-02281 ) Plaintiff, ) Judge J. Philip Calabrese ) v. ) Magistrate Judge ) James E. Grimes Jr. J.M. SMUCKER COMPANY, ) ) Defendant. ) ) OPINION AND ORDER Like many employers, The J.M. Smucker Company required its workforce to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Under its policy, and to comply with the law, Smucker afforded employees medical or religious exemptions. Plaintiff Sherry L. Mendoza requested an exemption based on her religious beliefs. Specifically, Ms. Mendoza objected that she…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Saeid B. Amini v. Oberlin CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API