Rentmeister v. Desilva
Utah Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CROCKETT, Justice:
(concurring, with comments).
I am in entire agreement with the decision affirming the judgment of the trial court. But it seems to me that there could be a misunderstanding as to two statements made therein. Therefore, regretting the necessity of this addendum, I feel impelled to state as follows:
1. The conclusion of the opinion states that . . if there was a mistake in drafting the instrument, it nevertheless expressed the settlor’s true intention.” This strikes me as a paradox. That is, if there was a mistake, it would not express her true intention. But the fact appears to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In RE LAVELLE'S ESTATE. IMMERCHAL v. First SEC. BankUtah Supreme Court · 1952
- Peterson v. EldredgeUtah Supreme Court · 1952