Legal Opinion

Tri-State Casualty Ins. Co. v. Stekoll

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1949No. 33176PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

Prior to 1942 the plaintiff, operator of oil producing properties in Oklahoma, had secured workmen’s compensation and public liability insurance from defendant, a domestic casualty company, through its agent. Upon acquisition of oil properties in Kansas he made oral application to the agent for compensation and public liability coverage of his Kansas employees, and this application was transmitted to defendant. Pursuant to the request, February 25, 1942, defendant issued what was denominated an “extraterritorial endorsement” of plaintiffs policies, wherein it was stated that plaintiff did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rushing v. Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Boling v. AshbridgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  3. Curtis Gartside Co. v. &198tna Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Employers' Casualty Co. v. T. E. Wiggins, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Battiest v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cities Service Oil Co. v. Geolograph Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Redding v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Waugh v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  4. Zahn v. General Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  5. Shorten v. MuellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API