Marathon Nat. Bank v. SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES CTY.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
The question in this case is whether a trial court must hold a hearing before acting upon a discovery referee’s report. We hold that the trial court must independently consider the referee’s findings and any objections submitted by the parties before accepting or rejecting the referee’s recommendations but that this may be done in whatever manner the trial court deems appropriate under the circumstances, with or without a hearing.
Background
Richard Campbell sued Marathon National Bank (and some individually named officers and other employees), claiming his…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. RisenhooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Martino v. DeneviCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Aetna Life Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Sauer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- Bird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3Cited by8 opinions
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- De Guere v. Universal City Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Korea Data Systems Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- PEDUS SERVICES, INC. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Glickman v. KrolikowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.