PEDUS SERVICES, INC. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TURNER, P. J.
Defendant, Pedus Services, Inc., has filed a mandate petition pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 170.3, subdivision (d) 1 challenging the denial of its section 170.6 peremptory challenge to a discovery referee on timeliness grounds. We conclude the section 170.6 peremptory challenge was timely and issue our writ of mandate directing the respondent court to disqualify the referee.
This is an invasion of privacy and unlawful wiretapping case. The pertinent factual allegations were described in detail in our prior decision involving this same litigation in Clauson v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- People v. Superior Court (Lavi)California Supreme Court · 1993
- Rockwell International Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Clauson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- Zdonek v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Augustyn v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zilog, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara Cty.California Court of Appeal · 2001
- Grant v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001