Legal Opinion

Yonkey v. State ex rel. Cornelison

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1866PublishedCited by 27 opinions

APPEAL from the Clinton Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

This was an information under the statute, in the form of a quo warranto, in the name of the State, on the relation of Cornelison, against Yonkey and Sims, to determine the right to the office of recorder of Clinton county.

The information is in three paragraphs. The first of these alleges, in substance, that the defendant, Yonkey, was duly elected recorder of said county in October, 1860, and after said election was duly qualified and entered upon the duties of said office, which he continued to discharge until about the 1st day of December, 1863, at which time he vacated said office by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Leal v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
  2. State ex rel. Cornwell v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hedley v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1835

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gosman v. State ex rel. SchumacherIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Carmel Natural Gas & Improvement Co. v. SmallIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Relender v. State ex rel. UtzIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sweeney v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  5. Wells v. State ex rel. PedenIndiana Supreme Court · 1911

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API