Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Heilbron v. Van Brocklin

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1894No. 1196PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King Co'wnty.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— Respondent was removed from the office of member of the board of public works, of the city of Seattle, by the mayor, for cause alleged and found to be sufficient after notice and a hearing. The court below, in a proceeding by quo warranto against his successor in the office, rendered judgment in favor of respondent, ousting the successor and charging him with the salary of the office during the period of his usurpation.

The appellant filed an answer to the information in which he set up the proceedings taken by the mayor and his findings and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Donahue v. County of WillIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. People ex rel. Whitney v. Board of Delegates of San Francisco Fire DepartmentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  3. People Ex Rel. Hatzel v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  4. State ex rel. Smith v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1890
  5. People ex rel. Metevier v. TherrienMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Quick-Ruben v. VerharenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. Seattle Gas & Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Green Mountain School District No. 103 v. DurkeeWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State ex rel. Powell v. FassettWashington Supreme Court · 1912

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API