Legal Opinion
Dandridge v. Chromcraft Corp.
District Court, N.D. Mississippi
Decided January 24, 1996No. Civil A. 2:95CV26-D-BPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAVIDSON, District Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of the defendants for the entry of summary judgment in their behalf. Finding the motion partially well taken, the same shall be granted in part and denied in part.
FACTUAL SUMMARY
I. GENERALLY
The defendant Chromcraft Corporation initially hired the plaintiff Frank Dandridge as a janitor for its facility in Senatobia, Mississippi, on or about August 27, 1984. On September 15, 1986, the plaintiff was transferred to the position of plater rack mechanic, another position within the maintenance department. In this…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nicholas v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Brooks v. Firestone Polymers, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2014
- Cooper v. Drexel Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1996
- Montgomery v. MississippiDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2007
- Boren v. Wolverine Tube, Inc.District Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.