Legal Opinion

Vicari v. Spiegel

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided April 19, 2007No. 02069PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SYLVESTER, J,

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 1, 2002, Barbara Vicari died from tongue cancer. Counsel for her estate, in his opening argument, claimed that Mrs. Vicari was never offered chemotherapy. See Notes of Testimony, May 1,2006. (N.T., pp. 7, 42, 44-47.) That alleged omission was the gravamen of their case. A claim for medical malpractice was brought. Trial began on May 1, 2006.

Counsel for the estate produced medical experts. Their testimony was designed to support an action for medical *3negligence. The trial court entered a nonsuit on May 2, 2006. On November 30, 2006,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Vorbnoff v. Mesta Machine Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Mitzelfelt v. KamrinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Menarde v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  4. McMahon v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. McCrosson v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vicari v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Vicari v. SpiegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API