Lam v. General Mills, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Annie Lam (“Lam”) brings this putative class action against Defendant General Mills, Inc. (“General Mills”) for allegedly misleading consumers about the nutritional qualities of its fruit snacks, specifically Fruit Roll-Ups, Fruit by the Foot, and other, unidentified “similar products.” ECF No. 27 (“FAC”) ¶44. General Mills now moves to dismiss the action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 33 (“MTD”). The motion is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Williams v. Gerber Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
- Viggiano v. Hansen Natural Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Stack v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2013
- Figy v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Hendricks v. Starkist Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.