Legal Opinion

United States v. Robbins

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided June 18, 1998No. ACM 32613PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SNYDER, Senior Judge:

The primary issue we decide in this case is whether the Ohio fetal homicide statute may be prosecuted as a violation of Article 134, UCMJ, via the federal Assimilative Crimes Act (ACA), 18 U.S.C. § 13. We hold, yes.

Appellant was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial, pursuant to his pleas, of committing a battery on his pregnant wife, KAR, intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm on KAR, and committing involuntary manslaughter by unlawfully causing the termination of KAR’s pregnancy, wherein the 34-week-old fetus,…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  5. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  2. United States v. ButcherUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2000
  3. United States v. KawaiUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2006
  4. United States v. VinesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2002
  5. United States v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API