Legal Opinion
State v. Morrissette
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided November 15, 1999No. 98-412PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Defendant George Morrissette was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor as a third offense (DUI-3). Defendant pleaded guilty pursuant to a conditional plea agreement that reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motion to dismiss the enhancement allegation. We affirm.
In November 1997, defendant was charged with DUI as a third offense, the information alleging that he was previously convicted of the same crime on January 20, 1992 and again on October 30, 1997. Defendant was represented by counsel in both instances and did not appeal either…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. YatesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- James Edward Kennedy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- In Re HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1983
- In Re ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- State v. BoskindSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002
- State v. ClearySupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- State v. RiefenstahlSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- In re ManoshSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.