Legal Opinion
In re Manosh
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided August 14, 2014No. 2013-280PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. The question in this case is whether, in response to a post-conviction relief (PCR) petition, the court erred in vacating petitioner Nick Manosh’s 1992 conviction for a misdemeanor count of driving under the influence (DUI) based on the sentencing court’s failure to comply with Vermont Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 in taking petitioner’s no-contest plea. The State ■ appeals, arguing that the PCR court failed to take into account petitioner’s written waiver of his Rule 11 rights, and that the sentencing court’s colloquy substantially complied with Rule 11. We affirm.
¶ 2. The following…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- In re StocksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2014
- State v. MorrissetteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
- In Re ParksSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
- In re KirbySupreme Court of Vermont · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In re Anthony BridgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
- In re D.C., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re Kenneth Barber, Jr., Theodore C. Smith, Jr., Danielle M. Rousseau, John BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- Roy H.A. Watson III v. The Village at Northshore I Association, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In re Wight ManningSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.