Legal Opinion

State v. Riefenstahl

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 18, 2001No. 00-252PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Defendant Alan Riefenstahl was charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor in violation of 23 V.S.A. § 1201(a)(2), with a third offense felony enhancement. Defendant pleaded guilty pursuant to a conditional plea agreement that reserved his right to appeal the denial of his motions to suppress and dismiss for lack of probable cause to stop defendant and to strike his prior convictions. Defendant contends the trial court erred by: (1) denying his motion to suppress evidence derived from a stop of his vehicle based upon . information supplied by a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Florida v. J. L.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. Alfonso Sierra-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. BoyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. SennaSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  2. State v. GoldbergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2005
  3. In re Kenneth Barber, Jr., Theodore C. Smith, Jr., Danielle M. Rousseau, John BurkeSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. State v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. State v. SetienSupreme Court of Vermont · 2002

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API