Murrell v. McGuigan
Supreme Court of Missouri
Transferred from St. Louis Gourt of Appeals. (1) If the appellant wishes to have his supposed grievances passed upon and adjudicated by this court, it is his duty to have all the necessary papers and facts before the court as provided by the statutes, the rules of court and the law, and for neglect or failure to do so, he must suffer the penalty of having the judgment against him affirmed or his appeal dismissed. Disse v. Erank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder y.
Read the full summary
Transferred from St. Louis Gourt of Appeals. (1) If the appellant wishes to have his supposed grievances passed upon and adjudicated by this court, it is his duty to have all the necessary papers and facts before the court as provided by the statutes, the rules of court and the law, and for neglect or failure to do so, he must suffer the penalty of having the judgment against him affirmed or his appeal dismissed. Disse v. Erank, 52 Mo. 551; Snyder y. Eree, 102 Mo. 325; Thompson v. Allen, 107 Mo, 479; Cunningham v. Eailroad, 110 Mo. 208; Garrett y. Coal and Mining Co., Ill Mo. 279; Brand y.…
1Opinion of the CourtBuegess, J.
This is an election contest for a seat in the house of delegates, held in the nineteenth ward of the-city of St. Louis, on the second day of April, 1895.
Plaintiff had judgment in the trial court, whereupon defendant appealed to the St. Louis Court of .Appeals, by which the cause was certified to this court because of its. want of jurisdiction, a constitutional question being inyolyed.
The appellant has failed to comply with rules 11, 12 and 13 of this court, requiring the filing of a printed abstract of the pleadings and record, with “a complete index at the end,” and we therefore dismiss the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brand v. CannonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
- Garrett v. Kansas City Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1892
- Craig v. ScudderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Long v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Snyder v. FreeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vandeventer v. GossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- State Ex Inf. Attorney-General v. ParrishSupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
- Manuel v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Foster v. Vernon CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Payne v. PayneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.