Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Long

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 31, 2007No. 39 and 40 WAP 2005PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice CAPPY.

In this appeal, we are asked to consider whether the press has a common law or constitutional right of access to the names and addresses of the jury panel in a criminal trial. The Superior Court held that the constitutional right of access was satisfied when the press attended the proceedings and did not separately guarantee the press access to the jurors’ names and addresses. For the reasons detailed herein, we disagree with the Superior Court’s conclusions. Accordingly, the Order of the court is reversed.

The instant dispute arose out of the prosecution of Karl…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of OnondagaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  3. Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ListonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. Commonwealth v. Delgros, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. Guarrasi v. ScottCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Tooey v. AK Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. United States v. WechtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API