Legal Opinion

Virgil Herdman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 13, 1955No. 12431_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant is a freight conductor employed by the appellee railroad company. He brought this action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., for injuries he received while riding in the caboose of a freight train in the course of his employment. This appeal is from the judgment of the district court entered upon a directed verdict for the appellee railroad.

The appellant himself was his only witness at the trial. He testified that his injuries were received when he was thrown to the floor of the caboose by an emergency stop made by the train at a time when it was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herdman v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State ex rel. Burlington Northern, Inc. v. District Court of the Eighth Judicial District ex rel. County of CascadeMontana Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company v. Eugene L. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  4. Ringhiser v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1956
  5. Ferguson v. Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API