Legal Opinion

Meadville Forging Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 1, 2000No. 2620 C.D. 1999PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PELLEGRINI, Judge.

Meadville Forging Company (Employer) and its insurance carrier, Trans-General Services Company, appeal from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) affirming the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting James Artman (Claimant) benefits for an occupational hearing loss.

Claimant filed a claim petition on May 15, 1995 alleging that he sustained a bin-aural hearing loss as a result of exposure to occupational noise to which Employer answered by contending that claim was barred pursuant to Section 306(c)(8) (viii) of the Pennsylvania Workers’…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hills Department Store 59 v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. General Electric Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helvetia Coal Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Flatley v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Elliott Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Hayduk v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. E.W. Bowman, Inc. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API