Legal Opinion

Yellowstone Federal Credit Union v. Daniels

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 2008No. DA 07-0280PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris

¶1 Nate Daniels (Daniels) appeals from an order of the Sixth Judicial District, Park County, denying his motion to quash attachment. We reverse.

¶2 Daniels presents the following issues for review:

¶3 Whether the District Court properly denied Daniels’s motion to quash attachment for failure to comply strictly with §§ 27-17-101, et seq., MCA.

¶4 Whether the repossession statute, § 30-9A-609, MCA, violates Daniels’s due process rights as applied in this case.

PROCEDURAL AND FACTUAL BACKGROUND

¶5 Daniels entered into a loan agreement with Yellowstone Federal Credit Union (Credit Union) in November…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Connecticut v. DoehrSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Oster v. Valley CountyMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Isern v. SummerfieldMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Owens v. Montana Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. In Re the Marriage of NordbergMontana Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sports Shooting Ass'n v. State, Mt. Dept. of FwpMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Claire Pesarik v. Gabriel PerjessyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Funke v. Estate of ShultzMontana Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Cini v. Viscomi & Gersh, PLLP (In re Cini)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2013
  5. Claire Pesarik v. Gabriel PerjessyMontana Supreme Court · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API