Legal Opinion
Claire Pesarik v. Gabriel Perjessy
Montana Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 2008No. DA 07-0526PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morris
¶1 Claire Pesarik (Pesarik) appeals from an order of the Eleventh Judicial District Court, Flathead County, granting the motion to dismiss filed by Gabriel R. Peijessy, DDS, and denying Pesarik’s motion for enlargement of time. We affirm.
¶2 Pesarik presents the following issues for review:
¶3 Whether the District Court correctly determined that it lacked authority to grant Pesarik’s motion for enlargement of time to serve process upon Peijessy.
¶4 Whether the District Court properly concluded that Pesarik had failed to establish excusable neglect to warrant an extension of time to serve process…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- MCI Telecommunications Corporation v. Teleconcepts, Incorporated, Defendant/third-Party v. Bell of Pennsylvania, Third-Party Teleconcepts, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Dominic v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Haugen v. Blaine Bank of MontanaMontana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matthews v. Don K ChevroletMontana Supreme Court · 2005
- Foster Apiaries, Inc. v. Hubbard Apiaries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Cini v. Viscomi & Gersh, PLLP (In re Cini)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 2013
- Claire Pesarik v. Gabriel PerjessyMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re the Estate of CorriganMontana Supreme Court · 2014
- In Re the Estate of CorriganMontana Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.