Legal Opinion

Von Hennig v. Kennedy

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 19, 1961No. Nos. 16199, 16201Published

1Per curiam

The plaintiff executor of Carlo von Wedekind has appealed from a judgment of the District Court dismissing on the merits an action to recover certain property vested by the Alien Property Custodian on the ground that plaintiff’s decedent was not authorized by Section 9 (a) of the Trading with' the Enemy Act of 1917, 40 Stat. 419, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), to claim the vested property because he was resident outside the United States (in Switzerland) and doing business in Italy during the war years, and was an “enemy” as defined in Section 2(a) of the Act, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, §…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The William BagaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Fritz Von Opel v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General, as Successor to the Alien Property CustodianCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  3. Uebersee Finanz-Korporation, A.G. v. BrownellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
  4. Von Hennig v. RogersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API