Legal Opinion
Von Hennig v. Rogers
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 17, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 1819-49PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLTZOFF, District Judge.
This is an action under Section 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act, Title 50 of the U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 9(a), to secure the return of certain property seized by the Alien Property Custodian during World War II, on the ground that it was owned by an enemy.
The action was originally brought by Carlo von Wedekind. He died during the pendency of the action, and the present plaintiff, Horst von Hennig, was substituted as party plaintiff in his capacity as •ancillary executor of the estate of the original plaintiff. The property that was seized by the Alien Property…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schilling v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Horst Von Hennig, Ancillary of the Estate of Carlo Von Wedekind, Deceased v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United States, as Successor to the Alien Property Custodian v. Horst Von Hennig, Ancillary of the Estate of Carlo Von Wedekind, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Von Hennig v. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961