Legal Opinion

Estate of Richards v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 14, 1953No. Docket Nos. 34010, 34013PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Bruce, Judge:

With respect to.the inclusion in gross estate of the value of the inter vivos trust created by the decedent, respondent’s primary contention is that it falls within section 811 (c) (1) (A), Internal Revenue Code,2 as a transfer in contemplation of death. The question as to whether the transfer is of such character is one of fact, and our finding that the transfer was not in contemplation of death answers respondent’s contention.

We think our conclusion upon this question is amply supported by the record. The trust in question was one created by the decedent more than 15…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Garrett's Estate v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. Ruthrauff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  3. Heidt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  4. Estate of Garrett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  5. Estate of Hunt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Laycock v. HammerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  2. Landorf v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  3. Baldwin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  4. Crosley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1966
  5. Estate of Mudge v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API