Estate of Garrett v. Commissioner
United States Tax Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Oppek, Judge:
The issue here raises the usual problem in contemplation of death cases; that of determining by a deductive process from all the facts the nature of decedent’s dominant motive for making the transfers. The issue does not arise here with equal force as to all of the interests transferred. Decedent made three separate transfers. Respondent now appears to concede that the property embraced in the so-called Trust No. 2 may be eliminated from the estate. That concession is presumably founded on the purpose to be gathered from the instrument of transfer itself: that decedent…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hassett v. WelchSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allen v. Trust Co. of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- City Bank Farmers Trust Co. v. McGowanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Colorado National Bank v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ruthrauff v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
- Karagheusian v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1955
- Estate of Richards v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- Arents v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960
- Thacher v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.