Legal Opinion

The Hoover Company v. Royal Appliance Mg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 31, 2001No. 00-1219PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAYER, Chief Judge.

The Hoover Company (Hoover) appeals the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, Opposition No. 96,834 on Application No. 74/462,460 (December 17, 1999), dismissing Hoover’s opposition of Royal Appliance Manufacturing Company’s (Royal) registration of the mark “The First Name in Flooreare.” We affirm.

Background

On November 23, 1993, Royal filed an application to register “The First Name in Flooreare” on the principal register for “electrical vacuum cleaners for both domestic and industrial use,” in class nine. The…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Estate of P. D. Beckwith, Inc. v. Commissioner of PatentsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. In Re Dixie Restaurants, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. On-Line Careline, Inc. v. America Online, Inc., (Substituted for Compuserve, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  4. In Re Bongrain International (American) Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. In Re the Boston Beer Company Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In Re Bayer AktiengesellschaftCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  2. Bose Corporation v. Qsc Audio Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  3. In Re Pacer TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. In Re Chippendales Usa, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  5. Duopross Meditech Corp. v. Inviro Medical Devices, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API