Legal Opinion
In Re Bayer Aktiengesellschaft
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 24, 2007No. 2006-1279 (Serial 78/212,751)PublishedCited by 119 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MOORE. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge NEWMAN.
MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Bayer Aktiengesellschaft (Bayer) appeals the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Board) ruling that the proposed mark ASPIRINA is merely descriptive for analgesic goods. In re Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, Serial No. 78/212,751 (TTAB Mar. 17, 2006) {Final Decision). Because the Board’s ruling is supported by substantial evidence, we affirm.
BACKGROUND
On February 10, 2003, Bayer filed an intent-to-use application under 15 U.S.C. § 1051(b)(1) to register the mark ASPI-RINA in…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Savin Corporation v. The Savin Group, Savin Engineers, P.C., Savin Consultants, Inc. D/B/A Savin Engineers, P.C., and Jmoa Engineering, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Bayer Co. v. United Drug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1921
- In re Abcor Development Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
- In Re Dial-A-Mattress Operating Corporation (Serial No. 75/131,355)Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Coach Services, Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Viterra Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re the Chamber of Commerce of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Royal Crown Company, Inc. v. the Coca-Cola CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Zheng Cai v. Diamond Hong, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.