Legal Opinion
Bose Corporation v. Qsc Audio Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 14, 2002No. 01-1216PublishedCited by 106 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Bose Corporation (“Bose”) appeals from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) dismissing its opposition to the application of QSC Audio Products, Inc. (“QSC”) to register the mark POWERWAVE for amplifiers and power amplifiers. The Board concluded that there is no likelihood of confusion between POWERWAVE and two of Bose’s marks, ACOUSTIC WAVE and WAVE. Bose Corp., Opposition No. 109,664, 2000 WL 1759738 (TTAB Nov. 16, 2000). We have jurisdiction over Bose’s appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(4). Because the Board erred in several respects in its…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- In re E. I. DuPont DeNemours & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Octocom Systems, Inc. v. Houston Computer Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Palm Bay Imports, Inc. v. Veuve Clicquot Ponsardin Maison Fondee en 1772Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Coach Services, Inc. v. Triumph Learning LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Water Pik, Inc. v. Med-Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Citigroup Inc. v. Capital City Bank Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Quicksilver, Inc. v. Kymsta, CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.