Legal Opinion

Texas Eastern Transmission Corp. v. Barnard

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1960No. 14057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McALLISTER, Chief Judge.

Appellant, an interstate pipe-line company, entered into a contract with appellee owners of real estate, for a right-of-way over the latter’s property for the purpose of constructing a pipe-line thereon, and repairing and inspecting it. The contract provided that in case of differences between the parties, any controversy between them should be submitted to arbitration; that if either party should demand arbitration, and the other party should fail and refuse to designate an arbitrator within thirty days after writ*537"ten request therefor, then the arbitrator ■designated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kentucky River Mills v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
  2. In Re Utility Oil CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1934
  3. Hayes Mfg. Corp. v. McCauleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
  4. Central Contracting Co. v. GrignonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. John M. King, and v. Ben T. Stevenson, AndCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
  2. Universal Reinsurance Corporation v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  3. Carter v. Cathedral Avenue Cooperative, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation v. R. L. BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  5. Employers Insurance of Wausau v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API