Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Formica Insulation Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DENISON, Circuit Judge.
The appellant brought in the District Court the usual infringement suit upon claims II and 12 of patent No. 1,284,432, issued November 12, 1918, to O’Connor, on .an application filed February 1, 1913, covering a process for making composite materials. The two claims are alike, save that claim 12 calls for “a phenolic condensation product,” while claim 11 more broadly reaches in the same association any suitable adhesive substance. Claim 12 is given in the margin.1
In the court below the defenses were that these claims were invalid, or that, if valid, they must be so…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lane & Bodley Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Siemens-Halske Electric Co. v. Duncan Electric Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
- Woodward v. Boston Lasting Mach. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Babcock v. ClarksonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1894
- Chicago & A. Ry. Co. v. Pressed Steel Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Applied Arts Corp. v. Grand Rapids Metalcraft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
- Mariani v. SummersNew York Supreme Court · 1944
- Buckingham Products Co. v. McAleer Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Severson v. OlsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.