Legal Opinion

State v. McKinney

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 9, 1982No. 21726PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated assault and battery and was sentenced to nine (9) years’ imprisonment, suspended upon the service of three (3) years and five (5) years’ probation. Appellant now alleges his guilty plea was not knowingly and intelligently entered. We dismiss the appeal for the reason set forth below.

Appellant failed to assert before the trial court that his guilty plea was not knowing and intelligent as required by Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U. S. 238, 89 S. Ct. 1709, 23 L. Ed. (2d) 274 (1969). In State v. Bradley, 263 S. C. 223, 209 S. E. (2d) 435 (1974), we held failure to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. SullivanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. BradleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1974

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. RochevilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  2. State v. BurroughsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. State v. StandardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BickhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API